Zelensky, Netanyahu, and von der Leyen - The Three Dictators and the Global Elit

Zelensky, Netanyahu, and von der Leyen - The Three Dictators and the Global Elit

“Do you know what Zelensky, Netanyahu, and von der Leyen — these dictators — have in common?
Once they lose their positions, they will move into solitary cells.”
— Tomasz Froelich, Member of the European Parliament

1. Not National Leaders, but Agents of a Global Structure

Zelensky, Netanyahu, and von der Leyen do not represent the national interests of their peoples.
They serve the interests of a transnational managerial layer — the global elite.
This is not a secret conspiracy but a structural dependency deeply embedded in the global system.

2. Financial and Economic Integration

All three figures are firmly woven into the fabric of global finance — the IMF, the World Bank, transnational corporations, and the military-industrial complex.
Their decisions serve not the citizens below, but the capital and lobbyists above.
Power, in this configuration, flows upward.

3. Ideological Unification

They all repeat the same slogans: “democracy through force,” “war for peace,” “values through sanctions.”
These are not personal beliefs but part of a standardized narrative, crafted by global think tanks and influence networks such as the World Economic Forum, the Atlantic Council, and data corporations.
It is a model of perception management, not of genuine political thought.

4. Political Interdependence

Each of them stays in power thanks to external guarantees.
Zelensky depends on the Pentagon and the U.S. State Department.
Netanyahu relies on the American military-industrial lobby and evangelical networks.
Von der Leyen stands on the support of German and U.S. financial groups.

Losing office for them would mean breaking away from this system of patronage —
and that’s why Froelich’s metaphor of “solitary cells” feels so precise:
outside the structure of global power, they have no autonomous legitimacy.

5. Moral Devaluation

They no longer believe in nations, religions, or ideologies.
Their faith lies in the system itself — the management of flows of money, information, and loyalty.
They serve not the elite as people, but the elite as a mechanism,
as a self-replicating algorithm of control and obedience.

6. The New Opposition

In short — they serve the global oligarchic system,
where democracy has become an instrument rather than a goal.

Yet, against this dependency, a new political current is rising —
anti-globalist and sovereigntist, spreading from Europe to Asia.
It marks the beginning of a struggle to reclaim not just sovereignty,
but the very meaning of politics itself.